Reviews
Recognised by clients and courts alike
What our clients have to say
“I would like to extend our heartfelt thanks for the exceptional forensic accounting work you delivered throughout this case. Your analysis was clear, precise, and grounded in an impressive level of diligence and professional rigour.”
“Geoff, your witness evidence in particular was exemplary—thorough, measured, and unwavering in its clarity.”
“The strength of your work played a meaningful role in helping the court understand the financial realities at the heart of this matter.”
“We are very grateful for all your efforts with this matter. The way you both picked apart the claimants’ quantum and plans/costs for the remedial works was instrumental in us being able to reach settlement on the terms agreed, and we really appreciate everything you have done.”
“I would just like to add my personal thanks to you both for all your efforts on one of the most challenging bit of litigation (well certainly most challenging claimants) we have worked with in a while. As always, you have both been a pleasure to work with and your input has been invaluable.”
“Your analysis was fundamental to the success of the mediation.”
“Thank you for the commitment and detail you applied to our case. Whatever the outcome, I believe we are in a stronger position because of your efforts.”
“Your advice was most helpful – very user-friendly and clear for our client.”
“I will also personally recommend you to our panel of solicitors.”
“You will be the first person we will approach should we require the services of a forensic accountant in the future.”
“Your advice was most helpful – very user-friendly and clear for our client I have been singing your praises to all who will listen.”
“Thank you for your expertise in this matter and the valuable guidance that you were able to give us in court.”
What Court judgments say
“The evidence of Mr Mesher was more persuasive.”
“Mr Mesher gave considered, moderate evidence throughout, even when challenged on the basis that he had no relevant expertise and had made serious errors, and appeared to me to have exercised reasonable and sensible judgment.”
“The contents of the spreadsheet were not assumed to be correct but were subjected to appropriately rigorous forensic analysis by Mr Mesher.”
“I conclude therefore that Mr Mesher’s values for … apartment sales …in counterfactual scenario … are reasonable and persuasive assessments of the average likely sales values.”
“I accept Mr Mesher’s opinion that it is the preferable method because it facilitates a ready comparison of businesses.”
“I accept Mr Mesher’s analysis both of the multiplicand (which is quite close to that of Mr X) and of the multiplier.”